So,
should we force OAP Southampton homeowners to downsize?
Well
in the original article, I suggested that we as a society should encourage,
through building, tax breaks and social acceptance that it’s a good thing to
downsize. But should the Government force OAP’s?
Looking
at the statistics for Southampton, of the 23,311 Homeowners who are 65 years
and older, whilst 12,835 of them described themselves in good or very good
health, a sizeable 7,790 home owning OAPs described themselves as in fair
health and 2,686 in bad or very bad health.
11.52%
of Southampton home owning OAP’s are in poor health
But
if you look at the figures for the whole of Southampton City Council, there are only 770
specialist retirement homes that one could buy (if they were in fact for sale)
and 2,766 homes available to rent from the Council and other specialist
providers (again- you would be waiting for dead man’s shoes to get your foot in
the door) and many older homeowners wouldn’t feel comfortable with the idea of
renting a retirement property after enjoying the security of owning their own
home for most of their adult lives.
My
intuition tells me the majority ‘would be’ Southampton downsizers could
certainly afford to move but are staying put in bigger family homes because
they can't find a suitable smaller property. The fact is there simply
aren’t enough bungalows for the healthy older members of the Southampton
population and specialist retirement properties for the ones who aren’t in such
good health ... we need to build more appropriate houses in Southampton.
The Government's Housing
White Paper, published a few weeks ago, could have solved so many problems with
the UK housing market, including the issue of homing our aging population.
Instead, it ended up feeling annoyingly ambiguous. Forcing our
older generation to move with such measures as a punitive taxation (say a tax
on wasted bedrooms for people who are retired) would be the wrong thing to do.
Instead of the stick – maybe the Government could use the carrot tactics and
offered tax breaks for downsizers. Who knows – but something has to happen?
..
and come to think about it, isn’t the word ‘downsize’ such an awful word? I prefer to use the word ‘decent-size’ instead
of ‘down-size’- as the other phrase feels like they are lowering themselves, as
though they are having to downgrade themselves in their retirement (and let’s
be frank – no one likes to be downgraded).
The simple fact is we are
living longer as a population and constantly growing with increased birth rates
and immigration. So, what I would say to all the homeowners and property owning
public of Southampton is ... more houses and apartments need to be built in the
Southampton area, especially more specialist retirement properties and
bungalows. The Government had a golden opportunity with the White Paper – and
were sadly found lacking.
And a message to my Southampton
property investor readers whilst this issue gets sorted in the coming decade(s)
– maybe seriously consider doing up
older bungalows – people will pay handsomely for them – be they for sale or
even rent? Just a thought!
If you are an existing landlord or someone thinking of become a first-time landlord looking for advice and opinion and what (or what not to buy in Southampton), one source of information is the Southampton Property Blog
If you are looking for an agent that is well established, professional andcommunicative, then contact us to find out how we can get the best out of your investment property.
Email me on brian.linehan@belvoirlettings.com or call on 023 8001 8222.
Don't forget to visit the links below to view back dated deals and Southampton Property News.
Twitter, https://twitter.com/sotonbelvoir
LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/brianlinehan
LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/brianlinehan
I constantly emailed this site post page to all my friends, because if prefer to read it then my all friends will too.
ReplyDeletepier27condo.ca
Your write-ups are far more than wow!
ReplyDeleteImmobilier à Cognac